Discussing: Narsil in the Wild - a new problem?
Narsil in the Wild - a new problem?
Marta
Message: 32638
20 Oct 04 6:45 AM
Original Post
General Audience
Read-Only
Message: 32638
20 Oct 04 6:45 AM
Original Post
General Audience
Read-Only
Re: Narsil in the Wild - a new problem?
I do not think he walked about Eriador with Narsil all the time, which would be really ridiculous. You cannot defend yourself and I do not think a ranger would carry such a useless thing as a broken sword because it would only hinder him.
In 'Strider' Aragorn states that he had been away on an errand of his own. At time he was away he already knew that the Hobbits would come out of the Shire and awaited them anxiously when they finally came.
From the time he was told by Gandalf of their coming to the end of september he would have had enough of time to fetch it Narsil. This anxiuosity might be a sign that he was told by Gandalf to "watch out for Frodo" ('You may meet a friend of mine on the Road... by some called Strider' - Gandalf's Letter in 'Strider')
I think Aragorn deemed the sword to be some kind of proof he could give the hobbtis.
Apart from this, was it stated anywhere that Aragorn possessed no other weapon? He just did not need to use any! There were no common foes on the road and Nazgûl could not be fought with sword or bow.
Greetings, Vil
Re: Narsil in the Wild - a new problem?
Re: Narsil in the Wild - a new problem?
Re: Narsil in the Wild - a new problem?
fliewatuet
Re: Narsil in the Wild - a new problem?
Re: Narsil in the Wild - a new problem?
Re: Narsil in the Wild - a new problem?
Re: Narsil in the Wild - a new problem?
Re: Narsil in the Wild - a new problem?
Re: Narsil in the Wild - a new problem?