Discussing: Standard Categories
Standard Categories
Anglachel
Message: 1038
04 Dec 02 8:15 PM
Original Post
General Audience
Read-Only
Message: 1038
04 Dec 02 8:15 PM
Original Post
General Audience
Read-Only
Name: Obvious. This already exists inside of the database. Except - not obvious, what about multiple names?
Years: This is trickier than it looks. How do you give years for beings who were born outside of time? Ordinarily, you can enter in a standard number for birth/death and do calculations and such (match them up to events, for example), but no can do with immortals, Valara/Maiar, etc.
Physical Description: OK, is this to be taken verbatim from the books? Or generalized?
Parents: If known or applicable.
Books where mentioned: Given many versions of books, how do we cite them?
There's a big question ==> How do we cite books? This is probably the most important reference point, and is damn difficult with so many versions being produced.
Events: What counts as an event? Only canonical events? Can interpreted events be placed and flagged? Should events be tied to dates so as to enable on the fly timelines of events? Here's a thought - an event may have many people so perhaps events should be independent of characters.
Milestones: perhaps different than events. The Battle of the Pelennor is an event by any consideration - is Denethor's death an event or a milestone?
Just a few stray thoughts.
Ang
Re: Standard Categories
Names: put most widely known or used as primary name, then list aliases and nicknames. E.g. Galadriel, also known as Altariel, Nerwen, the Lady of the Wood, et al. (Indicate what language the name is in if known?)
Years/Time: Most beings can be pinned down to having been born in a particular Age, at least. Give specific dates (by Age) if known.
Descriptions: I'd say generalize, largely b/c some descriptions might be overly long otherwise.
Books where mentioned: Page numbers are clearly problematic, but chapters should not be. More work for the reader/author trying to track down a particular citation, but also more possible to do regardless of the edition or translation being used.
Cel
Re: Standard Categories
I agree with you Cel that we need to use the closest dates possible, whether year or simple age. And chapter citations.
All this is easier for the minor characters. In order to avoid too much work for anyone, the major characters can be broken up into ages.
Ang, if someone came up with a standardized list, how hard would that be to turn into a template? Worth doing?
Lyllyn
Re: Standard Categories
Re: Standard Categories
Re: Standard Categories
Re: Standard Categories
~Maka
Re: Standard Categories
Agreed. I tried to tackle this a bit in the Glorfindel factsheet, although I didn't get as detailed as I might have.
Perhaps we should add a category 'Contradicions, controversy, and comment.'
Lyllyn